Главная  /  Наука и инновации  /  Исторический поиск  /  Metadata for the articles  /  Historical Search, 2025, vol. 6, no. 2  /  CONSTRUCTION OF THE «GIANT» IN CHEBOKSARY IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE ECONOMIC AND YOUTH POLICY OF THE SOVIET STATE IN THE 70s AND 80s OF THE XX CENTURY (to mark the 50th anniversary of the first tractor output at Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant)

CONSTRUCTION OF THE «GIANT» IN CHEBOKSARY IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE ECONOMIC AND YOUTH POLICY OF THE SOVIET STATE IN THE 70s AND 80s OF THE XX CENTURY (to mark the 50th anniversary of the first tractor output at Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant)

DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2025-6-2-24-40

УДК 94:629.3.014.2(470.344)”197/2025″

ББК У305.483-03(2Рос.Чув)63

Vyacheslav B. LASTOCHKIN

Key words

the USSR, the Chuvash ASSR, Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant, heavy machinery, technical and technological modernization of the national economic complex, innovations: political and organizational work, All-Union Leninist Young Communist League, youth policy of the Soviet state, import substitution.

Abstract

Studying the historical experience of constructing large national economy facilities in the USSR makes it possible to identify effective forms of interaction between enterprises, educational institutions, scientific institutes and design bureaus that contributed to successful solution of important economic and political tasks. The construction of Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant lasted three five-years and became the All-Union Komsomol shock construction project. The analysis of the Komsomol’s activities in this construction helps to study more deeply the specifics of the youth policy of the Soviet state during this period.

The purpose of the study is to identify the socio–political factors that influenced the course of design, construction, staffing, further modernization of production and development of Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant, and to analyze the role of the Komsomol in these processes in the context of the youth policy of the Soviet state.

The scientific novelty of the research lies in using modern methodological approaches to the study of specific aspects of the economic and youth policy of the Soviet state in the 70s and 80s of the XX century, which determined the course of construction and further development of Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant, the importance of this facility for domestic national economic complex and the socio-economic development of Cheboksary and the Chuvash Republic, as well as introducing new insufficiently studied facts into scientific circulation.

Materials and methods. The sources of the research were the archives of a unique Cheboksary Museum of Tractor History and the National Museum of the Chuvash Republic, the memories of veterans. The principles of historicism, objectivity, complexity, methods of comparative historical and historical-genetic analysis were applied.

Results. In accordance with the directives of the XXIV Party Congress on the ninth five-year plan for the development of the USSR national economy for 1971–1975, the construction of the largest enterprise of the Ministry of Tractor and Agricultural Engineering of the USSR, an industrial tractor plant was launched in Cheboksary, and at the same time – a residential Novoyuzhny area near it, with modern socio-cultural, transport and household infrastructure. Workers and specialists, enterprises of related industries, educational institutions and research and design institutions of the entire Soviet state took part in the construction of this industrial giant and its provision. The Komsomol, which patronized it, played an important role in the construction. It declared one of the key national economic facilities of that time at its XVII Congress in April 1974 to be the All-Union Komsomol shock construction project. In October 1975, the first Cheboksary tractor was officially output from the main assembly line of the plant. Subsequently, Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant became the leading domestic enterprise in producing heavy industrial tractors, bulldozers and pipelayers adapted for mass use in a wide variety of natural conditions including extreme ones in all regions of the USSR and many foreign countries. Since 1977, the company has operated a large multidisciplinary metallurgical production «Promtractor – Promlit» (industrial casting plant). The tractor complex has contributed and continues to contribute to intensification of Chuvashia’s industrial development and has made a great contribution to ensuring the economic security of the USSR and modern Russia.

Conclusions. The construction and further development of Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant was a successful result of systematic coordination and cooperation in the work of party and government bodies, enterprises and institutions of the Soviet Union within the framework of a megaproject for intensification of the USSR national economic complex. The Komsomol played a crucial role in solving this problem. The success with which the Komsomol coped with this responsible task was evidence of the effectiveness of the youth policy implemented by the Soviet state at the historical stage under consideration. The experience of construction, development and modernization of tractors production in Cheboksary, cooperation and coordination of related enterprises, logistics structures, life support, research and development work, and personnel training can be in demand in the process of solving urgent problems of Russia’s economic modernization on a modern innovative technological basis.

References

  1. Bolotin M.G., Maksimov L.I., Sergeev A.N. Traktor: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Tractor: past, present, future]. Cheboksary, Perfektum Publ., 2019, 256 p.
  2. Brezhnev L.I. Rech’ na Plenume TsK KPSS 27 noyabrya 1979 g. [Speech at the Plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU on November 27, 1979]. Pravda, 1979, Nov. 28.
  3. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv sovremennoi istorii Chuvashskoi Respubliki. F. 1. Op. 37. D. 48. L. 6–7. [State Archives of Contemporary History of the Chuvash Republic. Archive 1. Op. 37. D. 48. L. 6–7].
  4. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv sovremennoi istorii Chuvashskoi Respubliki. 1. Op. 37. D. 69. L. 54–55. [State Archives of Contemporary History of the Chuvash Republic. Archive 1. Op. 37. D. 69. L. 54-55].
  5. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv sovremennoi istorii Chuvashskoi Respubliki. 1. Op. 41. D. 28. L. 50–56. [State Archives of Contemporary History of the Chuvash Republic. Archive 1. Op. 41. D. 28. L. 50-56].
  6. Dokumenty TsK VLKSM 1973.M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1974. 256 p. [Documents of the Central Committee of the Komsomol 1973. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya, 1974. 256 p.].
  7. Dolgushin I.I. Sud’ba zavoda, budushchee goroda [The fate of the plant, the future of the city]. In: Dorogoi sozidaniya. Vospominaniya [The Road of Creation. Memories]. Cheboksary, 2006, pp. 104–111.
  8. Il’ina O.A., Maksimov L.I., Tarakanova L.M. Vernost’ traditsiyam, predannost’ delu. K yubileyu zavoda «Promlit» [Loyalty to traditions, dedication to the cause. On the anniversary of the Promlit plant]. Cheboksary, Perfektum Publ., 2023, 272 p.
  9. KPSS v rezolyutsiyakh i resheniyakh s”ezdov, konferentsii i Plenumov TsK. T. 10. 1969–1971. 8-e izd., dop. i ispr. [The CPSU in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and Plenums of the Central Committee. Vol. 10: 1969–1971. 8th]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1972, 536 p.
  10. Nikitin A.S. Nauchit’sya vygodno torgovat’ [Learn to trade profitably]. Bloknot agitator, 1989, no. 14, pp. 18–21.
  11. Nikolaev A.G. Prityazhen’e Zemli. Zapiski kosmonavta-3 [Gravity of the Earth. Notes of aCosmonaut-3]. Cheboksary, Chuvashiya Publ., 1999, 140 p.
  12. Nikolaev V.V. Ocherki istorii i letopis’ goroda Alatyr’ i Alatyrskogo uezda na fone istoricheskogo razvitiya Rossii XVI – nachala XXI vekov. 2-e izd., dop. [Essays on the history and chronicle of the city of Alatyr and Alatyr district against the background of the historical development of Russia in the 16th – early 21st 2nd ed.]. Cheboksary, Novoe vremya Publ., 2014, 836 p.
  13. Prokop’ev I.P. O merakh po vypolneniyu reshenii XXV s”ezda KPSS o sozdanii moshchnostei i organizatsii seriinogo proizvodstva promyshlennykh traktorov. Doklad na VI plenume Chuvashskogo Obkoma KPSS 20 maya 1977 g. [On measures to implement the decisions of the XXV Congress of the CPSU on the creation of capacities and the organization of serial production of industrial tractors. Report at the VI Plenum of the Chuvash Regional Committee of the CPSU on May 20, 1977]. Sovetskaya Chuvashiya, 1977, March 21.
  14. Prokop’ev I.P. Eto nasha s toboi biografiya [This is our biography]. In: Dorogoi sozidaniya. Vospominaniya [The Road of Creation. Memories]. Cheboksary, 2006, pp. 16–53.
  15. Putin V.V. Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii Federal’nomu Sobraniyu RF 29 fevr. 2024 g. [Address of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation February 29, 2024]. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2024, no. 9288, March 1.
  16. Radichenko A.N., Sergeev T.S. Formirovanie i razvitie tekhnicheskoi intelligentsii Chuvashskoi ASSR v 1920–1991 gg. [Formation and development of the technical intelligentsia of the Chuvash ASSR in 1920–1991]. Cheboksary, 2002. 224 p.
  17. Sokolova V.I. Molodezh’ Chuvashii v 1965–1985 gg.: opyt realizatsii sovetskoi molodezhnoi politiki [Youth of Chuvashia in 1965–1985: the experience of implementing Soviet youth policy]. Cheboksary, 2009, 160 p.
  18. Kharitonova V.G. «Promtraktor» [«Promtractor»]. In: Kratkaya chuvashskaya entsiklopediya [Brief Chuvash Encyclopedia]. Cheboksary, Chuvash Publ. House, 2001, p. 338.

Information about the author

Vyacheslav B. Lastochkin – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Russian History, Chuvash State University, Russia, Cheboksary (vyacheslav_lastochkin@mail.ru).

For citations

Lastochkin V.B. Construction of the «giant» in Cheboksary in the discourse of the economic and youth policy of the Soviet state in the 70s and 80s of the XX century (to mark the 50th anniversary of the first tractor output at Cheboksary Industrial Tractors Plant). Historical Search, 2025, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 24–40. DOI: 10.47026/2712-9454-2025-6-2-24-40 (in Russian).

Download the full article